We’re still in the off-season here in the Midwestern United States (though spring is thankfully right around the corner) and I have to keep myself entertained somehow. I wrote a post awhile ago on Coaster101 about how I had created my own track record using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet complete with stats from the Roller Coaster Database. Well, I used those stats and compared the height, speed, and length differences between thirty wood and steel roller coasters that I’ve rode. I’ve excluded any rides with launches, multiple lifts, or elevators. The first graph shows speed (in miles per hour) versus height (in feet). Wood and steel coasters are pretty similar which is expected because gravity acts the same on each. However, when we look at the graph for length versus height we see a bit of separation between wood and steel. Generally, the steel coasters are taller but their overall length is shorter than their wooden brethren. Why is this? A couple of possible explanations: · Steel coasters hit the final brakes with more speed and unused energy · Higher friction coefficients in steel coasters so they slow down and lose energy faster (possibly due to the type of wheel material, bearings, etc.) · Or maybe it’s just because steel are more expensive to build A 20 million dollar 200 foot tall wooden coaster will get you 7000 feet of track while a 20 million dollar 200 foot tall steel coaster will only get you 6000 feet of track. Of course, there are other variables that could be looked at to get the full picture: old versus new rides, manufacturer, operator, etc. The steel ride list’s consist of all train types thrown in together (flyer, standup, etc.) – maybe one type in particular has much heavier trains and is skewing the data. Just for fun, I included a graph where I added a couple of extreme roller coasters which I had originally excluded from the other charts, such as launched coasters and ones I’ve never ridden. Some outliers I’d like to point out: El Toro, Formula Rossa, and Top Thrill Dragster. Can you name any of the other outliers just by looking at the graphs? 5 Responses Kurt Dahlin February 24, 2012 Very interesting look at the various coasters! Definitely gave me a flashback to my college statistics class, especially when talking about outliers. 🙂 Reply Chris February 25, 2012 Son of Beast is pretty obvious 🙂 Reply XYZ March 1, 2012 On that last spreadsheet, Formula Rossa is definitely an outlier with it’s long length due to the high speed of the ride and the short height. Reply Matt McIrvin March 7, 2012 Curiously, though you can see that nice parabolic curve, the speed vs. height data seem to run just a little faster than what one would expect from a frictionless drop starting at zero speed. I guess the car usually has a little kinetic energy even at the top of the lift (unless there’s a holding brake). Or maybe someone’s goosing the stats a little… Reply Jarret November 28, 2012 Kingda Ka is kind of obvious on that chart with really tall and not very long track length. Reply Leave a Reply Cancel ReplyYour email address will not be published.CommentName* Email* Website This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.